?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

A Penny For Your Thoughts -- $15 To DVR It

The Content Mafia has been continuing to try to hijack people's home theater systems.  It's called Selectable Output Control, and basically means they would control things like your Tivo (the kill switch that enables automatic deleting of your recorded programs past the content provider's date) or anything connected by the digital HDMI (the "broadcast flag" that many deny exists.  Seriously, I've provided the code from the EFF to video traders who say I'm just making it up).  SOC is illegal under the FCC.  Recently, the MPAA has tried to grease the wheels a little by saying they wanted to offer movies before they hit DVD, but to keep them from being simply recorded, they want the FCC to grant them a waiver so they can use SOC.  Today, they got a new ally.  Time Warner Cable, which has already helped kill Usenet and tried to put limits on people's Internet usage, has joined the fray.  Their proposal is they would allow these movies to be received only on boxes connected by HDMI.  If you connect with analogs (the cable coax or RCA jacks), you would be blocked from the content.  This goes for the Tivo, too, and I just know the expiration flag is in there somewhere.  You don't play by their rules, you don't get the content.  Time Warners arguement is actually that so many subscribers have at least one TV set up with all digital connections, no one will really be inconvenienced.  Never mind the slippery slope this creates.

This happened today.  A couple of days ago, the fine folks at Public Knowledge addressed the FCC, saying the MPAA had yet to establish any need for a waiver of SOC.  Time Warner hasn't, either.

Which way will this go?  I don't know.  Obama stocked the AG posts with lots of RIAA connected lawyers and has blown off FOIA requests.  I worry this will result in another blow to our digital rights.

Of course, I'm not sure most people would fight for them anyway.  Not a lot of people are aware of the opportunity this will create.  Everyone has forgotten DiVX already....

Comments

( 2 comments — Leave a comment )
mornblade
Sep. 18th, 2009 12:08 am (UTC)
As I personally prefer no not have to switch through multiple television inputs to find the device I wish to watch at any given time, I feed my DVR/DirecTV receiver through my DVD/VCR combo and then to my TV. That way I can switch easily from one item to the next. But to do this, I have a coax that goes to the DVR, then RCA plugs that go to the Combo, and then to the TV. So, I would be screwed.

Meanwhile, I still have the entire last season of Battlestar Galactica on my DVR, as I've been waiting to find time for my wife and I to sit down and watch them. So to delete them would defeat the purpose of having a DVR.

As for offering Pay-Per-View before DVD release, are they TRYING to kill the small video store?

sinetimore
Sep. 18th, 2009 12:24 am (UTC)
Yes. Because that way, the sales go directly through the studios and their cohorts instead of being marked down, making someone else money, and giving control elsewhere. They still try dinking with it (aligning with Blockbuster for exclusive videos that small owners had to import from Canada). Remember, everyone is an obstacle to the studio's making money. 3D cinema is being held up because the studios think the theater chains should pay for and supply the glasses, and the theater chains feel Hollywood is making the movies like that, THEY should pay for the glasses.

To quote Level 42's "Almost There", "Play your part and DON'T GET IN THE WAY..."
( 2 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

June 2019
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com