Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The government just can't resist sticking its nose in with the little guys while leaving the big boys alone.

On December 1, if you are a blogger who has received a comp copy of something to review, you are required to disclose that.

Ostensibly, I don't have a problem with that.  Some of the games I review for Video Game Trader are comps (I also have a considerable stash in my collection that I pull out when I need to).  Some reviews, it's obvious they got comps (especially with comic books.  Come on, you think they can just pop down to the shop and find some of these titles?).  And it does help weigh how objective a review is.  After all, if someone gets more than just, say, the price of postage to return a review copy, that might influence how a review comes out.

So what's my bitch?

This is for bloggers.  The rules are unchanged for other media.  And as we've seen time and time again with payola or old boy networks, disclosure is crucial, not only for the sake of review, but to keep an industry from becoming a walled off fortress that only those with a patron inside the gates can get to.  In short, those who can pluck the strings that hold of the world are left alone while bloggers have to show they aren't doing anything shady.

Nope.  Nothing fair about it.


( 2 comments — Leave a comment )
Oct. 6th, 2009 12:44 am (UTC)
Are they calling the comp item an income? If so, it should apply to every medium as well as meals comp'ed to food critics.

If it's not being counted as income, then what does it fucking matter?

Next they'll say I can't review a movie that I watched on the DVR.
Oct. 6th, 2009 11:37 am (UTC)
No, they aren't insisting it be called income, thankfully. Although, it is possible to take advantage of this. If cards are played right, this could be the end of "Get The Facts" style web pages by M$.
( 2 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

June 2019


Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com